Pages

Thursday, 28 September 2023

The nature of the problem



Ben Sixsmith has a useful Critic piece on predictable hand-wringing responses to Suella Braverman’s multiculturalism-critical speech.


Contra Braverman’s critics

Liberals and leftists wring their hands while avoiding the real issues

Now the dust has settled following Suella Braverman’s multiculturalism-critical speech to the American Enterprise Institute in the United States, it’s worth looking at some of the claims of her critics. Such is their tone of moral opprobrium and intellectual haughtiness that they must have torn the Home Secretary limb from rhetorical limb — no?

We can skip over the likes of Mehdi Hasan, who can’t get their heads around the fact that a child of immigrants might be critical of immigration. I thought it was us villainous right-wingers who were meant to believe that individuals should be defined solely by their ethnic heritage, but apparently it’s nice progressives. Ah well. You live and learn.

Easily the dumbest responses come from people who deny that there are problems at all. “What is the basis for the claim that many arrivals live a separate existence in a parallel society?” Gavin Barwell chirrups. “I live in one of the most diverse parts of the country. You’re talking about my friends and neighbours. It is untrue and deeply offensive to suggest they’re not part of our society.”


Sixsmith then goes on to blow Gavin Barwell out of the water by reminding us of a list of multicultural failings. The whole piece is quite short and well worth reading as another hint that the pendulum may just have begun to swing back. Probably too late though.


The plain fact is that there are no smoothly effective means of integrating immigrants on the scale that they have entered Western European nations — and, contra Braverman, one cannot draw a clear distinction between legal and illegal immigration here. Combine a lot of different ingredients together in one dish, in great quantities, and your cooking methods become less than wholly relevant. This is not to denigrate immigration, still less immigrants (full disclosure: I am one). It is a question of numbers, and our chin-stroking, forehead-rubbing discourse in the normal language of border management is not up to the job. Braverman at least appreciates the nature of the problem — even if, after decades of Conservative promises, words sound a lot cheaper than they should.

5 comments:

Sam Vega said...

The government admits that 18% of our population were born overseas, and to that we need to add on all those who are here illegally. After the Norman conquest, the percentage was about 0.4%.

The most dedicated anti-racist and open borders fanatics ought at least to acknowledge we are living through an unprecedented and reckless experiment.

A K Haart said...

Sam - yes that's the best way to put it - an unprecedented and reckless experiment.

Tammly said...

I said exactly the same thing in 1970, when I was 16. Only now are people beginning to echo my views, as they certainly did not then. It's taken a mere half century.

A K Haart said...

Tammly - yes, we knew then that integration wasn't happening as assumed.

Tammly said...

Well I'd had a good deal more real world experience than my fellow students. I'd lived in the middle east and been prithee to the animosity between peoples, which was repeated when I went to live in Scotland. All these centuries of the Union and I could still be called an 'English Pig' by other children who didn't know me and I had just met. And I'd come there straight from Jerusalem! I know what integration and multiculturalism really is.