But if you ask me what is the good of man, I cannot mention
to you anything else than that it is a certain disposition of the will with
respect to appearances.
Many dreadful events unfolded in the nineteen thirties, events which
changed the world, but something else was unfolding too, a certain pragmatic clarity of outlook with more subtle
consequences. Or perhaps there were no consequences at all. Perhaps
that’s the point.
No black scorpion.
In 1934 behaviourist B F Skinner
attended a dinner where he sat next to
philosopher Alfred North Whitehead
. After Skinner had explained his work on
behaviour to the great man, Whitehead remarked “Let me see you account for my
behaviour as I sit here saying ‘no black scorpion is falling upon this table.’”
Next morning Skinner began work on his book Verbal Behavior
, in his view his most important book. An account of language in terms of stimulus, response and reinforcement, it took him twenty years.
Language, Truth and
In 1936 philosopher A J Ayer
published Language, Truth and Logic
, a short and accessible philosophy book which rattled the teeth of the
staid world of philosophy. In later years Ayer rejected much of it as wrong, yet for most of us it is near enough, a starting point, an engaging account of what makes sense and what doesn’t, what a personal philosophy can do for us and what it cannot do.
Skinner was 30 and Ayer 25. Young and keen as mustard. Both were empiricist
in outlook, believing that what we know of the world is mainly derived from what is observable. Both were interested in the way we use language, knowing how deceptive it can be. Skinner was interested in how we use
language to mould our personal and collective behaviour, Ayer in how we use it
to deceive ourselves and others.
Unfortunately there is a problem with the essentially straightforward approaches used by both men to tackle the endless
complexities of the human situation. Vested interests, hierarchies, the
power of politics, authority, academia, status and money all benefit from otherwise pointless
There is another glass ceiling apart from the one we hear so much about these days. Cause and effect are all very well in their place, but allowing such ideas onto the hallowed ground of politics and power is a different matter. Everything
would have to change. Everything would have to adapt, to accommodate the cold
blue light of reason emanating from even the lowliest peasant, from even their
children. Whatever next?
When Ayer and Skinner were young men, science, engineering money
and optimism were helping to transform their world into what appeared to be a
better place, not merely physically better but intellectually better too. The
stultifying deference of centuries appeared to be crumbling away before an
onslaught of merit, education, curiosity and cool reason.
Perhaps the onslaught still goes on at a slower pace, but the horrors of war intervened, diverted our attention into less useful directions. Other imperatives and influences choked off anything which might damage the status quo. The imbecilities of popular culture began to take hold. The mindless thump, thump of popular music, mawkish sentiment, idiot lyrics and faux rebellion.
The embarrassing crassness of celebrity culture grew and
grew as mass communication grew and grew, as the technology of influence became
cheaper and cheaper. An endless diet of dumb piped into almost every home via
millions of radios and televisions.
Ayer and Skinner were revolutionaries in their way. If we had
listened, if we’d absorbed the essence of their message then perhaps in time we’d
have learned to control the world. But we didn’t. And we won’t because of the
sheer weight of pressure to bend the metaphorical knee, swill the beer and dance round the
maypole just as our medieval forebears did.
Democracy and mass education went nowhere because how could
they go anywhere? The peasants would have to get up off their knees, throw aside the beer mug, burn
the maypole and that would never do. So we have cheap wine instead of beer, cheap
food, cheap jobs, expensive homes and mass voting instead of democracy. Maybe
our suspicions should have been aroused as the franchise grew because surely a
vote wasn’t worth anything if millions could have it for nowt.
As for education, no doubt it serves its purpose but we
aren’t about to teach the radical stuff which so enthused Ayer and Skinner
eighty years ago. We aren’t about to teach kids how to think clearly, how to slice through the mental shackles because in
the end it still doesn’t suit the way we are, the way we seem content to remain.
Behavior used to be
reinforced by great deprivation; if people weren't hungry, they wouldn't work.
Now we are committed to feeding people whether they work or not. Nor is money
as great a reinforcer as it once was. People no longer work for punitive
reasons, yet our culture offers no new satisfactions.
B F Skinner
It seems that I have
spent my entire time trying to make life more rational and that it was all
A J Ayer