George Santayana on truth as what he calls the immovable standard and silent witness of all our memories and assertions.
The eternity of truth is inherent in it : all truths—not a few grand ones—are equally eternal. I am sorry that the word eternal should necessarily have an unction which prejudices dry minds against it, and leads fools to use it without understanding. This unction is not rhetorical, because the nature of truth is really sublime, and its name ought to mark its sublimity.
Truth is one of the realities covered in the eclectic religion of our fathers by the idea of God. Awe very properly hangs about it, since it is the immovable standard and silent witness of all our memories and assertions ; and the past and the future, which in our anxious life are so differently interesting and so differently dark, are one seamless garment for the truth, shining like the sun.
Not far removed from Baruch Spinoza’s idea of God where the only possible interaction with the immovable standard is to understand as far as we are able.
This is what we compromised with the rise of secular culture, that immovable standard. It was not improved or replaced by immovable truths so many crooks, charlatans and fools try to foist on us today. Santayana goes on –
It is not necessary to offer any evidence for this eternity of truth, because truth is not an existence that asks to be believed in, and that may be denied. It is an essence involved in positing any fact, in remembering, expecting, or asserting anything; and while no truth need be acknowledged if no existence is believed in, and none would obtain if there was no existence in fact, yet on the hypothesis that anything exists, truth has appeared, since this existence must have one character rather than another, so that only one description of it in terms of essence will be complete ; and this complete description, covering all its relations, will be the truth about it.
No one who understands what is meant by this eternal being of truth can possibly deny it ; so that no argument is required to support it, but only enough intensity of attention to express what we already believe.
George Santayana - Scepticism and Animal Faith (1923)
1 comment:
I am very suspicious of 'essences'. First of all as a philosophical naturalist I think that essences (other than manufactured or harvested ones like 'vanilla essence') do not exist in reality. They are verbal shortcuts to identify social ideas, and like all verbal shortcuts they have no 'eternal' meaning being open to translation by people with an agenda.
And that, I expect, is why I am unsettled by the current fashion for 'wokeness'. However honestly believed it is based on an 'essence of victimhood' which mutates and changes as the 'political juice' is used up. Often catching out the people who don't keep up with the latest iteration.
Post a Comment