Wednesday, 17 November 2021
A blast of vituperation
A refreshing blast of vituperation from Jonathan Meades in the Critic. It is a warning that France should take a hard look at journalist Boris Johnson before replacing Emmanuel Macron with journalist Éric Zemmour. The piece reminds me of the late Auberon Waugh's remarkable talent for vituperation. A sad loss, but this is pretty good.
A once major power is led into nightmarish catastrophe and chaos by a journalist of sorts. A cruel mendacious antinomian narcissist, an aspirant dictator who revels in destruction (judicial powers, free speech, constitutional safeguards) having learnt the joys of destruction and ostentatious oafishness at, astonishingly, a seat of “learning”. The oaf’s only creation is a shivering, starving bedlam hidden by a policy of coarse populism, formerly trading as bread and circuses. They bring hope to the gullible millions. They are instruments of delusion.
Another once major power is rashly taking little notice. France persists in believing in the Ingerlandland of Major Thompson, frigidity and the stiff upper lip. It has not registered the country’s emotional incontinence. It has quite failed to see through the Prime Shit’s threadbare mask of amiable bumbling clown and children’s entertainer, and is becoming excited by the probability of a journalist’s candidature in next spring’s presidential elections.
Good stuff, it's a pity we don't see more of it.
It should be heeding the warning from outre-Manche. Polls in mid-October put the ubiquitous broadcaster and columnist Éric Zemmour in second place behind Emmanuel Macron. He has overtaken Marine Le Pen, the loser in every election in living memory who has, by moderating her policies, alienated her core vote. All this, even before he has confirmed that he will stand.
Labels:
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Mr Meade has wonderful way with words.
Knowing him from his TV programmes, I can just imagine him rolling these words out.
We need more like him.
Yes, Meades is something of a minor National Treasure, and I hadn't seen anything of him for a while. His one-off programmes were intelligent and perceptive, which is very rare in TV.
Boris might not be everyone's cup of tea, but there are people who will always loathe him because of Brexit, pure and simple.
The question in my mind is whether or not such vituperation is more likely to damage rather than heal social division. If it is careless of the consequences then the choice of words is as narcissistic as the person it is aimed at.
Doonhamer - we do need more like him, if only to emphasise how divorced from reality we can become by accepting each little step.
Sam - I don't know if he is still on TV, but it is worth checking if he does much online work.
DJ - yes the social division is a problem although I think people generally find vituperation more amusing than persuasive. Only if they have some sympathy with the attack of course.
There is an obvious problem of correcting matters when an official position drifts away from what is possible into situations which are likely to be damaging. Debate is generally ineffective when positions have solidified. I have a blog post in mind relating to this kind of issue.
Post a Comment