Commenter dearieme recently passed on a very interesting Daily Sceptic piece about official lockdown justifications. The whole piece is well worth reading but I'll quote just one section to give a flavour of it.
The extent to which states can be said to act upon clear motives at all is a further problem. A longstanding Plague Chronicle argument is that modern managerial government doesn’t have goals, motivations or purposes in any human sense. Our countries everyday do all kinds of truly insane things behind paper-thin justifications that bear no scrutiny. A lot of what is maligned as ‘conspiratorial’ discourse, on both the Left and the Right, represents an effort to reimpose logic on state actions, generally by positing that the stated goals are a pretence for some deeper, hidden purpose. Most of the time these analyses just aren’t convincing, and they function to obscure the blunt reality that we find ourselves beset by an incomprehensible post-liberal political order, in which state actions have been farmed out to a vastly complex network of stakeholders, NGOs, academics, bureaucrats and special advisory committees. For every area of policy the constellation of forces will be different, and nobody has any clear understanding of how the system works – not even the most powerful individuals in the midst of it all. Everything the state does is the sum of these thousands of different forces. What complicates this picture even further, is the fact that those responsible for policy formulation don’t act directly to shape outcomes in the outside world. Their motivations are almost always institutionally mediated, and for this reason much more confined and limited in perspective. They want to secure promotion and grant funding, they want to be thought well of by their peers, they want to satisfy their superiors, and many other petty careerist personal things of this nature.
The problem is not new, the Chesterton quote in the previous post is an aspect of the same thing, but the situation is even more complex today. Yet we still don't have concise ways to describe the problem in detail because as the Daily Sceptic piece says - nobody has any clear understanding of how the system works.
4 comments:
"For every area of policy the constellation of forces will be different, and nobody has any clear understanding of how the system works..."
And yet there are still people who are convinced that a Government (Socialist of course) knows enough to run an entire nationalised industry - or even an economy. Despite all the failures over the years.
DJ - it seems to be at least partly the attraction of simple ideas. As if something which can be said is in principle something which can be done.
Ah! But think how democratic it is. All that power diffused through so many individuals - even if they don't know what they're doing!
Tammly - if only we could prevent some of them from doing what they are doing, things could become clearer.
Post a Comment