Not likely to make it but another hint that the lights may be going out for Labour. The wrong end of a revolution perhaps - and how ironic that would be.
4 comments:
Ed P
said...
In terms of amusement value, I'd vote for Wrong-Daily over Lammy*. But any of the likely candidates should provide months of fun, as none of them can accept that the majority of voters do not want their brand of Marxism, preferring the centre-ground. * spell-check suggested Mammy instead - it's waycist!
I'm not being racist or nuffin' - nah, honestly,I ain't got a racist bone in me entire body, and I've got loads of really good black mates, and all that, so I'm definitely not racist, ask anyone who knows me, deffo not racist...but Lammy does look like a cartoon drawing of an African dictator.
4 comments:
In terms of amusement value, I'd vote for Wrong-Daily over Lammy*. But any of the likely candidates should provide months of fun, as none of them can accept that the majority of voters do not want their brand of Marxism, preferring the centre-ground.
* spell-check suggested Mammy instead - it's waycist!
I'm not being racist or nuffin' - nah, honestly,I ain't got a racist bone in me entire body, and I've got loads of really good black mates, and all that, so I'm definitely not racist, ask anyone who knows me, deffo not racist...but Lammy does look like a cartoon drawing of an African dictator.
Whomever they install is not only incompetent but destructive.
Ed - I'd vote for Wrong-Daily too, Lammy is too ghastly to be amusing.
Sam - Idi Amin?
James - that's the problem. Too many duds they can't get rid of even if they wanted too.
Post a Comment