Demons is a fascinating and powerful novel by Fyodor
Dostoyevsky published between 1871 and 1872. For those who haven’t read it, a brief summary from Wikipedia -
Demons is an allegory of the potentially catastrophic consequences
of the political and moral nihilism that were becoming prevalent in Russia in
the 1860s. A fictional town descends into chaos as it becomes the focal point
of an attempted revolution, orchestrated by master conspirator Pyotr
Verkhovensky...
'Demons' refers not to individuals who act in various immoral or criminal ways, but rather to the ideas that possess them: non-material but living forces that subordinate the individual (and collective) consciousness, distorting it and impelling it toward catastrophe.
The demons of the title are effectively evil ideologies which take possession of susceptible people. As Jordan Peterson has said, ideologies possess people, not the other way round. Dostoyevsky's novel also sheds a powerful light on our modern world and our apparent inability to preserve the civilisation which nurtured us. We cannot absorb the lessons of history, having lost sight of the political and moral nihilism eating away at what we are – soon to be what we were.
'Demons' refers not to individuals who act in various immoral or criminal ways, but rather to the ideas that possess them: non-material but living forces that subordinate the individual (and collective) consciousness, distorting it and impelling it toward catastrophe.
The demons of the title are effectively evil ideologies which take possession of susceptible people. As Jordan Peterson has said, ideologies possess people, not the other way round. Dostoyevsky's novel also sheds a powerful light on our modern world and our apparent inability to preserve the civilisation which nurtured us. We cannot absorb the lessons of history, having lost sight of the political and moral nihilism eating away at what we are – soon to be what we were.
Here are two extracts.
“Listen, Stavrogin. To level the mountains is a fine
idea, not an absurd one. I am for Shigalov. Down with culture. We’ve had enough
science! Without science we have material enough to go on for a thousand years,
but one must have discipline. The one thing wanting in the world is discipline.
The thirst for culture is an aristocratic thirst. The moment you have family
ties or love you get the desire for property. We will destroy that desire;
we’ll make use of drunkenness, slander, spying; we’ll make use of incredible
corruption; we’ll stifle every genius in its infancy. We’ll reduce all to a
common denominator! Complete equality!
Listen. I’ve reckoned them all up: a teacher who laughs
with children at their God and at their cradle; is on our side. The lawyer who
defends an educated murderer because he is more cultured than his victims and
could not, help murdering them to get money is one of us. The schoolboys who
murder a peasant for the sake of sensation are ours. The juries who acquit
every criminal are ours. The prosecutor who trembles at a trial for fear he
should not seem advanced enough is ours, ours. Among officials and literary men
we have lots, lots, and they don’t know it themselves. On the other hand, the
docility of schoolboys and fools has reached an extreme pitch; the
schoolmasters are bitter and bilious. On all sides we see vanity puffed up out
of all proportion; brutal, monstrous appetites.... Do you know how many we
shall catch by little, ready-made ideas?
Fyodor Dostoyevsky – Demons (1871-72)
No comments:
Post a Comment