If Rousseau, for instance, after writing those Confessions in which candour and ignorance of self are equally conspicuous, had heard some intelligent friend, like Hume, draw up in a few words an account of their author’s true and contemptible character, he would have been loud in protestations that no such ignoble characteristics existed in his eloquent consciousness; and they might not have existed there, because his consciousness was a histrionic thing, and as imperfect an expression of his own nature as of man’s.
George Santayana - The Life of Reason (1905-1906)
Suppose we move on from histrionic consciousness to the uses and abuses of intersectionality which are well illustrated in this Mercatornet piece.
American Youth Poet Laureate, Amanda Gorman, who read her poem, The Hill we Climb, at the inauguration of President Biden is a good example of the moral prestige of intersectionality. Amanda spoke of herself as “the skinny black girl, descended from slaves, raised by a single mother” who is now free to dream of becoming President. In those few well-chosen words, she bedded herself securely within the pie chart of intersectional disadvantage.
But the truth is rather more complex.
Amanda along with her twin sister was indeed raised by a single mother, Joan Wicks, a middle school teacher of English. However, Amanda’s back story suggests privilege too.. She attended a private school in Santa Monica called New Roads. The fees there are in the region of US$40,000 a year. New Roads is very politically correct. Its mission statement proclaims that “solidarity and allyship are in our DNA”.
Amanda went from New Roads to another bastion of American privilege, Harvard University, from which she graduated with a BA last year.
You would think that a thick layer of education privilege would thin out the layers of prejudice below it. Not so. New Roads and Harvard add to Ms Gorman’s social privilege but she retains the moral privilege of being intersectional. It’s a bit odd.
We could say that intersectionality is also a histrionic thing connected with the bolstering of egos, moral prestige, limited talent and even the justification of lucky breaks. Merit though – it certainly isn’t about that. Joe Biden diving straight in is all of a piece with the man.
American Youth Poet Laureate, Amanda Gorman, who read her poem, The Hill we Climb, at the inauguration of President Biden is a good example of the moral prestige of intersectionality. Amanda spoke of herself as “the skinny black girl, descended from slaves, raised by a single mother” who is now free to dream of becoming President. In those few well-chosen words, she bedded herself securely within the pie chart of intersectional disadvantage.
But the truth is rather more complex.
Amanda along with her twin sister was indeed raised by a single mother, Joan Wicks, a middle school teacher of English. However, Amanda’s back story suggests privilege too.. She attended a private school in Santa Monica called New Roads. The fees there are in the region of US$40,000 a year. New Roads is very politically correct. Its mission statement proclaims that “solidarity and allyship are in our DNA”.
Amanda went from New Roads to another bastion of American privilege, Harvard University, from which she graduated with a BA last year.
You would think that a thick layer of education privilege would thin out the layers of prejudice below it. Not so. New Roads and Harvard add to Ms Gorman’s social privilege but she retains the moral privilege of being intersectional. It’s a bit odd.
We could say that intersectionality is also a histrionic thing connected with the bolstering of egos, moral prestige, limited talent and even the justification of lucky breaks. Merit though – it certainly isn’t about that. Joe Biden diving straight in is all of a piece with the man.
3 comments:
All that money spent on Amanda's education, and she still does not have the sense to write a decent poem, nor - more importantly - the sense not to try it if you can't rise above the average.
"We could say that intersectionality is also a histrionic thing connected with the bolstering of egos, moral prestige, limited talent and even the justification of lucky breaks. "
I'd argue that we all are driven by our predispositions, and that rationality comes as an afterthought. As such most of what we do is 'performance art' to present ourselves to others in the best light. And if rationality plays a part it is usually used to justify our (often unthinking actions) to others and ourselves.
And 'performance art' perhaps explains why 'histrionics' and confected outrage have become so popular as people try to justify themselves and their place in the wider world - such as reading their poem during the Inauguration. It'll probably set her up for life.
It's not just 'performance art' any more, it's melodrama.
Sam - I don't know much about her apart from the way she obviously uses political fashions to bolster whatever talent she thinks she has. I'm reminded of Maya Angelou - I couldn't get on with her writing although that was years ago and all I recall is a lasting impression of dishonesty.
DJ - well said, I agree. We all perform to ourselves but some seem to be far more aware of it than others. And of course many people thrive on melodrama, particularly their own.
Post a Comment