Pages

Thursday 18 June 2020

Clinton appeals to whine lovers



Mrs Clinton, who lost to Mr Trump in the 2016 US presidential election, said: "Obviously I tried to warn about him when I was running against him and yet once it was over I hoped, along with many Americans, that he would rise to the job, that he would not be as bad as I feared.

"Sadly, he's been even worse and the COVID-19 crisis really sums up the deep failures of his presidency."


It is not easy to view Mr Trump’s abrasive style as unambiguously appealing, but in my view his authenticity certainly does have some appeal. With Trump and within the limitations of appealing to a mass audience the old clichĂ© works - what you see is what you get.

By way of contrast, when Mrs Clinton says I tried to warn about him when I was running against him, she demonstrates her lack of authenticity because at the time she thought she would win easily. She thought the polls proved it but the polls turned out to be as authentic as she is. The only time Mrs Clinton was authentic was her basket of deplorables comment.  

Mrs Clinton also reminds us of Obama’s impressively empty rhetoric and the dreadful fatuity of meaningless political speeches generally. At least we have some chance of grasping roughly what Trump is trying to do and why. It is not even worth listening to Mrs Clinton and certainly not worth analysing what she says. She is not even faintly authentic.

The problem is, huge numbers of people prefer inauthentic politics – fear of authenticity is part of US culture and ours here in the UK. For decades Hollywood has understood and exploited the inauthentic – even movies supposedly based on historical events are notoriously lacking in authenticity. Based on a true story – we know what that means. It means not authentic but let us entertain you by pretending otherwise.

Jeremy Corbyn was at least modestly authentic which is why he lost the last election so disastrously – he gave the totalitarian game away. Keir Starmer may be a far more accomplished politician than Corbyn, but is not as authentic. Starmer is not even as authentic as Boris Johnson but that isn’t saying much.

Looping back across the Atlantic to the US and Mrs Clinton, we are inevitably reminded of Joe Biden, Trump’s absurd presidential challenger. The polls say Biden is doing fine but have the polls suddenly become authentic? Whatever the polls say, don’t vote for inauthentic politics and expect an authentic result - that’s the Clinton lesson.

5 comments:

Sam Vega said...

Good post. I wonder whether those ambitious for a career in politics make a conscious choice to adopt a persona (i.e. head for the authentic) or whether their personality is formed before they seek office.

Boris is certainly an odd one. To me, he seems more authentic than some, but his obvious playing to the gallery and recent hesitation make him look like a man who is putting on an act of authenticity.

The Jannie said...

Whenever anyone asks why Trump became president, my answer is simply "look at what the alternative was."

Andre Surkis said...

I live in another part of the world, I am very interested in who the voters of America will choose this time.

Doonhamer said...

Use the search engine of your choice and find Party Political Speech by Peter Sellars.
No comment.

A K Haart said...

Sam - thanks and yes Boris is an odd one. He does play to the gallery and the gallery he mostly plays to seems to be packed with the chattering classes.

Jannie - yes she helped win it for him and still doesn't seem to realise.

Andre - I'm interested too but I hope it isn't Biden or his last minute replacement.

Doonhamer - he was good wasn't he?