As I see it, there are five possible global climate temperature
scenarios for the next five years. Apart from the unexpected that is!
- Unambiguous warming.
- Ambiguous warming.
- No change.
- Ambiguous cooling.
- Unambiguous cooling.
Even so, what may we say about the coming five years with
some degree of confidence? Obviously we have to guess, but if we are able to
get over the idea that this has much to do with science, then we may get
somewhere.
Commonly observed traits of human behaviour are what guide
us through the climate debate which in my view is mostly driven by global
political ambitions, middle class anxieties and an undue respect for authority.
Even so, it is surely possible to get away from the failures of climate science
and take a look at human nature.
Scenarios 1 and 2 should ensure the political and
intellectual survival of mainstream pro-AGW climate narratives. The other
three, namely 3, 4 and 5 will obviously cause increasingly severe problems for
the mainstream narrative.
If we assume that all five narratives are equally probable, and
we have no science to tell us otherwise, then there is a 60% chance that the
mainstream pro-AGW narrative may fail very badly indeed. It depends of the
resilience of the narrative which is undoubtedly powerful for both political
and emotional reasons.
On the other hand, there is a 40% chance that it will
succeed politically and intellectually, at least for that five year period.
Not that these percentages should be taken too seriously,
but we have to make sense of climate change somehow and the mainstream science
isn’t getting us anywhere. Most of it is far too speculative as a basis for
energy policies which one way or another will end up being driven by the real
world.
2 comments:
No change is very short term. In the last couple of thousand years we have had warm cold warm cold etc. In the really long term we have had ice ages and hot ages. At one time we could ask the ancient gods but they are either asleep or not online.
Demetrius - five years is a very long time in politics though.
Post a Comment