Pages

Wednesday, 11 March 2026

A Creature of the Establishment



The odd thing about Sir Keir Starmer, or rather one of the odd things about him as a politician, is his failure to create the impression that he has ever had any intention of making life better for voters.

On the contrary, he creates the impression that he would never do anything for anyone beyond the Establishment. For a Labour leader this is weird.

It may be that all political leaders are like this, but Starmer is unusual in that he appears to see not the slightest need to hide it, as if he is entirely unaware of the political need to hide what he is as the person behind the politician. He comes across as a creature of the Establishment but can't hide it.

Current polling suggests Labour would lose nearly 300 seats if a general election were to be held tomorrow. Yet Starmer carries on as if it is not his job to offer the party a better poll performance via changes which could benefit Labour voters. As if Labour voters are not his concern because voters are not his concern.

The problem seems to be Keir Starmer's personality, his awkward, managerialist outlook which is poorly adapted to encouraging other people. As far as we can tell, other people are not particularly significant for him, so encouraging them is equally insignificant.

Yes he's a creature of the Establishment, we've known that for ages, but he isn't supposed to make it so obvious. That he continues to do so is weird.

7 comments:

dearieme said...

The Unbearable Lightness of Keir

James Higham said...

He's a fervent believer in the Fabian principle that we are in the fourth stage of woe before the eventual socialist nirvana, where everyone has nothing and is happy. People under that regime are units to be fed and given a roof. End of.

DiscoveredJoys said...

My suspicion is that he has clawed his way into the Establishment and fears that he could easily be excluded from it if he didn't do what was expected of him.

decnine said...

Starmer has no need to hide anything. He has absolute power. Lord Acton was right.

A K Haart said...

dearieme - but not yet light enough to float away.

James - globalist Fabian plus law, that's all he seems to be, but it's not working as planned. Well - not yet.

DJ - yes, he does come across as a man with a brief to deliver and the power to deliver it, but the brief keeps changing and the power isn't as powerful as he hoped. He no longer seems to know what is expected of him apart from more repression and censorship.

decnine - he seems to have hoped so, but now appears to be puzzled that the power isn't always enough to get away with the corruption.

Tammly said...

The portrait you paint of him makes him a veritable psycopath.

A K Haart said...

Tammly - a sociopath perhaps, but he doesn't give many reasons to avoid the conclusion that he some kind of extreme.