Pages

Sunday 6 February 2022

More on the fake outrage



Laurence Hodge has a piece in TCW which is worth reading. It brings out the problem of weighing up the performance of Boris against the obviously fake outrage being used to take him down.

THE Conservative Home popularity poll for January was released a few days ago and the result reveals little: the current febrile environment means that individual performances are probably evaluated by panel members alongside the potential of Boris Johnson being forced to stand down...

Are the grass roots rooting for their beleaguered leader or is there more to Johnson’s mild upswing than that? Could it perhaps be that in all the media frenzy they recognise a simple truth: that Johnson, who is widely accused of being unable to organise a gathering in a brewery, is now lambasted for organising a concatenation of drinks parties and cake festivals.

The truth is probably that he unthinkingly let these things happen and that he absolutely shouldn’t have. However, there was a certain logical, unspoken hierarchy of rules, and Johnson was not barging into intensive care units or gate-crashing funerals. Many places of work, just like Downing Street, have continued to be staffed over the past two years and it is doubtful whether no birthday cakes were shared by staff behind the scenes at supermarkets or that the odd crate of beer didn’t make its way into delivery depots.

Without doubt Johnson should have done more to resist the authoritarian instincts of colleagues such as Hancock, Gove and Javid and the jackbooted enthusiasm with which rules were implemented by every petty official in the NHS, education, and almost every public sector institution you can think of, but every decision was taken against the baying of the opposition parties and the clamour of the media for ever more draconian measures. A sense of proportion and fairness is called for.


That jackbooted enthusiasm with which rules were implemented must concern anyone who lacks the jackboot gene. We certainly saw it in action and should not forget what we saw. And yes, every decision was taken against the baying of the opposition parties and the clamour of the media for ever more draconian measures. I wish Boris wasn't so sold on lunatic green policies though.

5 comments:

Woodsy42 said...

I think it will be the lunatic green policies which bring him down - if the public can find anyone less lunatic to replace him. If no such person or party is to be found then I think the example of the Canadian truckers is a foretaste of the type of social trouble in our future as prosperity reduces due to increasing household costs and restrictions.
I know in my case, we are on a pension and while the house is paid for and we are comfortable and able to enjoy life we need heating, food to eat and transport in our rural village. If any of the metropolitan greenies think we will -or indeed can - pay £40k for an electric car, £25K to convert to heat exchangers, cope with increased taxes like council tax and rampant inflation over the next decade they really are loonies! And we are better off than millions of working people who still have kids at home and mortgages to pay.

Doonhamer said...

Wise words, Woodsy.
Did Son of Kinnock not take 300 mile trip to London to say happy birthday to dad.
Did Ian Blackford, Wee Nippie's Westminster fat cat dock puppet, not drive 1200 miles (yes Skye is a long way from London.) to check his estate was ok.
Well at 40 pence per mile that's a lot of bawbees. Mony a mickle maks a muckle.
He was then able to buy a suit that fitted him. But that was probably on expenses too.

DiscoveredJoys said...

I wonder if the old Left/Right description of the political spectrum is still helpful?

You could make an argument that in the UK the extreme Right (not so many over here) and the extreme Left are better described as the New Authoritarians and the centre Left and Right are the New Liberals (sorry SDP, you don't show up as Liberal).

In which case the New Liberals reflect the values of the old Classic Liberals - a branch of liberalism that advocates free market, civil liberties under the rule of law with an emphasis on limited government, economic freedom, and political freedom (according to Wikipedia). I'll have some of that please, and the rest can go hang.

The Jannie said...

I hear "Bin Boris" almost every day and my answer is always the same: fine, who have you got to replace him? It's a short list . . .

A K Haart said...

Woodsy - the lunatic green policies may bring him down, but he may spot that in time to clear off and leave a lunatic to implement them instead of doing something about it.

Doonhamer - I don't think any of them believed the restrictions were really necessary but some were found out.

DJ - maybe we should lump all politics together and contrast a political outlook with an apolitical outlook. Concentrate on the similarities between different political positions rather than the trivial differences they prefer to emphasise.

Jannie - a very short list as far as I can see. Near enough nobody electable.