Regular comment maestro Sam Vega left this interesting
observation on a recent post.
What I find
interesting here is the fact that whereas some are protesting about his racism
and sexism, others blame him for global warming, some object to his
war-mongering, some to his support for capitalism, and some just think he is
personally boorish and uncouth. Not even Hitler gets it from so many
directions.
All this suggests a
group of people trained to think critically who are in search of something to
object to, rather than anything about the man himself.
It raises a question about progressives generally because we
tend to define them via their strident standpoints. Sounds like the obvious thing
to do but it is also instructive to turn it around. In other words it may be useful
to recall that progressives are defined by what they oppose as well as what
they promote which can be remarkably incoherent. They hate Donald Trump and as
Sam writes - Not even Hitler gets it from
so many directions
There are other factors, but to put it as simply as
possible, progressives oppose the world of the free market bourgeoisie built by
the West. There is nothing remarkable in that, it is something progressives
have been doing for a very long time indeed. Yet there has always been a
curious bond between reactionary elites and people we might usefully refer to
as reactionary progressives. The social forces behind that bond may reside in
the obvious power of the free market bourgeoisie to instigate unpredictable
change such as social mobility.
Most people see power as naturally top down whether they are
elites looking down from the top or progressives who also take a top down view
of how things ought to be. In spite of a reputation for conservatism, the free
market bourgeoisie are always liable to subvert top down power in unpredictable
ways. Their money, tastes and ambitions sway both markets and political narratives.
Perhaps this is the key to progressive paranoia, the banners
and the borderline hysteria. In one sense they are progressive but in a deeper
sense they are paranoid reactionaries. They want social stasis and they want it with a
passion. Trump is one of their bogeymen because he is seen to represent change
instigated by voters rather than the elite. Hence the borderline hysteria whenever
he is seen to challenge the progressive narrative. It looks like hysteria
because it is.
3 comments:
I've noticed that there is a new movement in politics, one hated by the old Tory paternalists and also by the progressives: populism. It's something that they can't control, because its essence is people actually making choices about what they really want. Elites' greatest fear might be that they don't actually know what is best. Hence the common political denunciation and condemnation these days is that people are stupid and unqualified.
It’s a great expression, reactionary progressives.
Sam - I agree. Freedoms seem to be popping their heads up all over the place and at the moment knocking them on the head doesn't really work in a digital age.
James - thanks :)
Post a Comment