Who was the last British Prime Minister? The question is worth asking because the role seems to have faded away to the status of provincial governor. The process of governing the UK has acquired at least three features which make much of the Prime Minister's traditional role redundant.
Firstly we are largely governed by
those who run global businesses, global bureaucracies and global pressure
groups. In other words, a host of global CEOs are in charge – not our provincial governor, or Prime Minister as we still insist on calling him. Global CEOs
have become a uniquely powerful social class. Local politicians merely deliver the PR - the democratic narrative with its jingoistic fairy tales.
Once we have free enterprise which isn’t free and isn’t
enterprising, once we blur the distinction between the corridors of government
and corporate power then we have a class of people who can’t be shifted except
by members of their own class. They share the power, they share the money and
spend enormous sums to keep things that way.
In short we are being milked and controlled by money - but
not sucked dry. It has taken only a few decades for the CEO class to realise
that only a modicum of comfort is necessary for social control. Not
comfort in itself, but the bovine acquiescence which comfort brings
with it.
A warm hut, a full belly and 24/7 entertainment. That does it.
Secondly and similarly, policy-making has gone global. Treaties,
international laws and heavyweight bureaucracies such as the EU and UN have taken
over the policy role of national government to such an extent that local political parties
are barely relevant except as PR vehicles.
Thirdly we have complexity, a key reason why nobody,
not even UKIP is ever likely to put these trends into reverse. The situation is
too complex to be resolved with the puny political levers we have left, too intricate to be untangled by negotiation or new laws.
The complexity isn’t merely political or legal, but also cultural. We have to want change and want it badly en masse. Otherwise there are too many threads, too many reasons not to resolve malign
trends, too many incentives not to see that they are indeed malign, too many reasons to oppose beneficial change, too many people doing just that.
So who was or will be the last British Prime Minister?
6 comments:
The bread and circuses phase.
Henry Campbell-Bannerman, PM 1906-1908.
I've taken the liberty of reposting this lock stock and barrel - hope you don't mind (with ack, natch!)
will appear Monday.
Sackers - which could go on for centuries.
Demetrius - good choice.
Witterings - no problem.
Do you know the first British Prime Minister? I read a surprising thing on that the other day.
James - Robert Walpole, but I don't know him personally (:
Post a Comment