British households would be £5,000 richer if we were more innovative. Let's unleash our talents
The coming 10 years are almost certain to be the decade that sees the greatest scientific breakthroughs in a century. The question is whether advances now under way in AI, quantum computing and biology can address cancer, find ways to treat or prevent dementia, and overcome the growing resistance to antibiotics. Can we find sustainable ways to address our energy needs and protect the environment at the same time? Can AI transform the way we deliver education, health and social care to the benefit of millions, as well as advance modern manufacturing strength? And what role can Britain’s inventors, investors and industrialists play in developing these transformative technologies?..
But it is disappointing that only 36% of the British public believes the country is a world leader in science. It is time for innovation to move to the forefront of government policy and the 10-year plan the government is preparing. If we were to raise Britain to Swedish or Japanese levels of innovation intensity we would, over time, leave every household £5,000 better off (according to my calculations)*, and increase our national income by £150bn a year as higher investment in research and development feeds through into productivity. And a jobs plan on the scale that Our Scottish Future has proposed for Scotland would mean about 3m new jobs across the UK.
*My underlining - the piece was written by Gordon Brown.

2 comments:
How interesting. When I knew Gordon I was the science one; his PhD was in Labour History.
Whenever pols bang on about science and engineering I am mighty tempted to ask "And what degrees are your children studying for?" I don't expect their answers to be Materials Science, Cell Biology, ...
dearieme - Gordon always struck me as a man who should have been a better politician than he was, but was hampered by an ideology he should have seen as futile and misleading.
"And what degrees are your children studying for?"
Something with political potential would be the honest answer in too many cases.
Post a Comment