Pages

Thursday 18 July 2019

Fantasies and futures




If Mrs H and I decide to downsize, where will we move to? Hmm – let me imagine the kind of house and location which would suit us –

As we all know, human beings have a highly developed ability to imagine future scenarios. So much so that this is one of the capabilities which appear to set us apart from other animals. Yet political narratives seem to misuse this crucial ability as a matter of course. Political scenarios may sometimes be plausible futures. Too often they are simple stories which only sound plausible at first sight. Often not even that.

We’ll bring about real change by putting real money into the NHS, schools, training, the fight against climate change, cute fluffy animals...

The problem is highlighted when children puzzle their way through childhood stories which adults know to be fantasy. For some reason we seem to think this is a good way to bring up children. Maybe it is but only for those children who make it to adulthood knowing the difference between fantasy and reality. Unfortunately that isn’t all of them. Although political stories tend to be just as formulaic as fairy stories, spotting their implausible nature does not seem to be a universal adult ability.

The usual way to explain this is to suggest that adults become biased in favour of their allegiances. Stories bolster those allegiance. Fair enough – it’s a very common explanation of these things and both sides in any debate are quite likely to use it to accuse the other lot of bias.

Yet many people do not seem to have a well-developed ability to imagine plausible political futures in the first place. As if we are losing the ability to see these things. As if prosperity and comfort have blunted our real world experiences. As if we are losing the ability to analyse.

Stories are taking over and there is little we can do if a catastrophic future lurks just over the horizon. However bad that future may be, collectively we are unlikely to foresee it.

3 comments:

Sam Vega said...

A by-product of complexity, I guess. The complicated conditionality which keeps us happy docile consumers cannot be challenged by any aspiring politician, but then thwarts that same politician's attempt to control it. We want whatever Zuckerberg or Musk are smart enough to provide, and that involves neutering the politicians.

James Higham said...

Getting more difficult to run the estate, servants quarters need renovation - yep, it can get tough. Retiring to the gamekeeper’s cottage seems the best move. :)

A K Haart said...

Sam - yes it seems to be a by-product of complexity.

"We want whatever Zuckerberg or Musk are smart enough to provide, and that involves neutering the politicians."

I've been thinking along those lines but the bureaucrats may have to be neutered too.

James - the trouble is we have to pay servants these days and it isn't easy to find anyone without tattoos and attitude.