Pages

Sunday, 4 March 2018

One of Stalin’s lesser lies


Back in 2009 Slate published a piece containing the story about a fake chess match between Stalin and chief of the secret police Nikolai Yezhov. 

Chess was a natural fit for the Soviet Union. For one thing, many of its thinkers and leaders were avid chess players. Lenin was a serious player, but Russian author Maxim Gorky claimed Lenin got angry when he lost. Leon Trotsky reportedly played in Vienna and Paris. Stalin cared so much about his reputation as a chess master that he publicized a fake game in which he claimed to defeat party loyalist and future chief of the secret police Nikolai Yezhov. (Stalin later had him executed.)

 Experts can tell that Stalin did not actually play the match because, as the narrator in this YouTube version says, the opening moves are too professional. However, Stalin’s little chess lie did not have to be particularly convincing. As Orwell suggested in his novel "1984", when political dominance reaches a certain level then the lies don’t have to be convincing at all. Hence the ludicrous official adulation of North Korea’s Kim dynasty.

In which case, how dominant does a political position have to be before improbable lies are good enough for general release? To my mind political correctness has reached that point already.

8 comments:

James Higham said...

There is neither lie nor truth - there is the State line.

Sam Vega said...

"In which case, how dominant does a political position have to be before improbable lies are good enough for general release? To my mind political correctness has reached that point already."

Certainly it has, but thankfully we retain the possibility of dissent. The problem for the new politically correct elite is that improbable lies - the really ridiculous, patently self-serving ones - can still be held up for scrutiny and abuse. The message is that if they lie about the small stuff, then they can lie about the big issues. That's why it's important to never give in.

Sackerson said...

Remember Mao's record-breaking river swim?

http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/long-reads/article/1999098/chairman-maos-historic-swim-glorified-china

wiggiatlarge said...

And the "Dear Leaders" golf prowess amongst other things.................

http://www.thecitizen.in/index.php/en/newsdetail/index/6/5186/10-myths-that-are-facts-in-north-korea-kim-jong-il-invented-the-hamburger

Scrobs. said...

There must have been a moment when state broadcasting like the BBC became blatant fake news, and therefore ignored as such.

I think it was soon after GB Inc decided to quit the EU, and President Trump took the reigns in the USA. Snowflakes and SJWs then began a whimper of rage, and can't really accept that they're losers now!

A K Haart said...

James - that's about it.

Sam - I agree, never give in.

Sackers - crikey that brought back memories. I well recall thinking how stunningly stupid it was. At the time I was baffled as to why anyone could go through with a deception so strikingly fraudulent.

Wiggia - and apparently he never used a toilet. It's weird.

Scrobs - I think the internet has a lot to do with it. Why watch BBC news anyway - property millionaires reading stuff off the internet?

Demetrius said...

My Dad was a good chess player, as he was deaf he was not distracted easily. He played for the County and was usually one of those selected to take on travelling international Masters. This could be a long post so I will skip to the point. Stalin if he played enough and was good enough would have had several different approaches in his mind when playing. If, like my Dad, he came up with the unexpected, that was part of the skill.

A K Haart said...

Demetrius - I think Stalin was probably a good player, but had not reached a professional standard and that is what gave the game away.