The firm has released a guide to the Face ID system, which explains that it relies on two types of neural networks - one of which has been specifically trained to resist spoofing attempts.
But a consequence of the design is that it behaves like a "black box".
Its behaviour can be observed but the underlying processes remain opaque.
Really this isn’t so different from the OCR systems I was
involved with over a decade ago. If the OCR system read flow as flaw, nobody
would ever know for certain why. We’d pick it up with error correction
systems and move on. I doubt if those who wrote the underlying recognition
software could tell us in any but general terms.
These machines “know” what they
are doing but we don’t know in detail and they can’t pass on that detail because they would hit us with impossible amounts of information. So as far as possible we let
them handle it and only get involved when things go wrong, which probably isn't as often as we'd like to think.
It isn't easy to dwell on modern technology without feeling somewhat superfluous. Are we here to give the machines something to do or is it the other way round?
It isn't easy to dwell on modern technology without feeling somewhat superfluous. Are we here to give the machines something to do or is it the other way round?
4 comments:
The one thing you can be sure of is - Apple users will tell everyone how wonderful it is and Apple will be making big bucks from it.
Sorry, those were two things . . .
Memo to Scrobs...
Buy another five pounds of minutes, the last lot ran out three years ago!
DCB - nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition... I like our iPad as a quick browser and Mrs H likes her iPhone. They just work but we still use Windows laptops.
Scrobs - crikey I must have spend ten pounds in those three years.
Post a Comment