A handwritten note has come into my possession which seems to be a
private memorandum outlining the substance of an inner shadow cabinet meeting
between Jeremy Corbyn and a few trusted colleagues.
For my eyes
only.
Main points to
be determined.
Is a three-line
whip sufficiently strong for a modern, disciplined and effective Labour party? Diane
suggests stronger discipline alone is sufficient but I really cannot go down
that path. I sometimes think she is pulling my leg with her gruesome ideas.
As far as key
Parliamentary votes go, my own idea is an expanded version of the three-line
whip to four lines. Rather a good idea I think. At least it would allow the
leadership to emphasise just how important certain Parliamentary votes are for
Labour policy and it would bring home yet again the inestimable value of
loyalty. A neglected issue in my opinion.
Diane suggests
a five-line whip so in order to maintain my authority I make an executive
decision that six-line whips will be introduced which is twice the number the
Tories have available to them. That should settle the matter but Diane keeps
sniggering and even suggests twelve-line whips so I know she is not taking the
issue as seriously as I’d hoped.
The next issue
is the vexed question of our Brexit policy which although absolutely clear
seems to have suffered from a range of mischievous interpretations.
Briefly our
position is that without the EU Britain after the Brexit vote should still be
in a position to decide for itself within the outcome of suitable negotiations
with our EU partners the substance of which although not subject to formal
procedures not yet established should otherwise be implemented with
Parliamentary approval.
Yes that should
do. At least it is a start.
Meeting closed.
2 comments:
With every respect, I think you are flogging a dead horse. Also, in ancient times didn't the principal monks in monasteries have a liking for flagellation?
Demetrius - I'll admit to a dead donkey.
Post a Comment