In his book Mind Time, Benjamin Libet raised
the possibility that free will is not so much a free choice as a conscious veto
on certain options as they bubble up from the unconscious. His experimental work was confined to motor control, but the idea is easily extended to wider issues
of belief.
In other words, free will may not be a matter of freely
choosing what to believe as freely choosing what not to believe - a conscious veto on social beliefs, opinions or narratives we have no wish to adopt.
If so, then belief simply implies that a conscious veto
has not been exercised. Scepticism implies the opposite - a conscious veto has
been exercised. In other words scepticism is the footprint of free will -
belief leaves no footprint.
The idea is not new and of course it works both ways. If I
veto any suggestion that the Earth is a sphere, then I may be exercising free will,
but it is a ludicrous and intellectually damaging achievement. I suspect this may
be one of the attractions of The Flat Earth Society – the free will aspect, the
attractions of dissent.
Because there do seem to be attractions to scepticism and
dissent. So much so that wholly conventional ideas are often presented as
dissent – which in one sense they often are. The traditional politics of left
and right for example. Both sides tend to use the language of
dissent, often by inventing straw men - or straw women. It must feel like the cool breeze of intellectual freedom, even when
no more than the other side of a numbing orthodoxy.
One obvious attraction of a broader and deeper scepticism is that the
options are less constrained. Possibilities remain open, further analysis is
always worthwhile. This seems to be the attraction of detachment. The veto is
active and well developed, but also rounded by habits of introspection.
Should I accept this idea
- or is there more to be understood? No I’ll pass for now - there is more to be
understood.
The veto is transformed into a positive experience; an
aspect of well-being, of a genial life lived apart from the rancour of
intellectual passion and coercion.
If feels like free will – possibly because it is.
4 comments:
Libet's theory - I don't believe a word of it.
Sam - yes it's rubbish... I mean I don't agree with you...
I was taught 'the mad do what the sane think'.
Some self restraint is needed (except on Saturday night).
Roger - I sometimes often wonder how many mad thoughts we veto. Some are bound to get through - especially on a Saturday night.
Post a Comment