From wikipedia |
My thought are still somewhat schnoz-driven, but here goes.
It seems to me that those people who support a political party are doomed to disappointment whenever or if ever their party achieves power. People who lead political parties always turn out to have little in common with their supporters, let alone voters.
It seems to me that those people who support a political party are doomed to disappointment whenever or if ever their party achieves power. People who lead political parties always turn out to have little in common with their supporters, let alone voters.
In times past, the elite may have had a somewhat diffuse and
unreliable sense of responsibility – the noblesse oblige of Bertie Wooster
perhaps, but that comfortable notion faded away some time ago, if indeed it ever strayed
beyond the pages of agreeable fiction.
Now we are left clinging to the cold comforts of naked political ambition coupled to the need for economic stability - shaky though the goal so often seems. We ordinary folk are
little more than economic agents needing a few ameliorative measures to nail us
to the straight and narrow.
These ameliorative measures keep us penned in, allowing our productive
lives to be sucked dry without actually causing the system to collapse. Folk
with full bellies and a warm hut don’t cause much trouble. What trouble they do
cause can be controlled by other folk with full bellies, a warm hut and a
uniform.
Political foot-soldiers seem to expect more, being undismayed
when their lot turn out to be at least as bad as the other lot. Most seem happy
enough to go to their graves with all their illusions intact, wholly immune from the canker
of doubt.
It’s not so far removed from the old days where loyal family
retainers spent their entire lives serving the needs of their masters living
their comfortable lives beyond the green baize door.
And yet...
...and yet it is never quite clear who really runs
the charade. Which side of the green baize door keeps the show on the road, whose appetites
are the more contemptible, whose social conventions have a firmer grip on the
nose.
3 comments:
Should it be "grippe on the nose"? And surely the word "seeming" needs to precede "economic stability"?
"Folk with full bellies and a warm hut don’t cause much trouble. What trouble they do cause can be controlled by other folk with full bellies, a warm hut and a uniform" - love it.
Might it be the Bertram Wooster, a farmer's son in Beaconsfield in 1881?
Sackers - ho ho - very good and yes, "seeming" really should be in there.
Demetrius - not unless he was at the same school as "Catsmeat" Potter-Pirbright.
Post a Comment