From Wikipedia |
Natural selection is an important evolutionary process where environments select
the behaviour of organisms within that environment and in the longer term their genetic endowment.
Suppose for a moment that we humans are sufficiently complex
in our behaviour that for some purposes we are best be viewed as a micro environment. In other words we
select some of our own behaviour. We do it by responding to our own feedback.
Usually an organism responds to stimuli from the environment
and other organisms, which we may lump together as responding to the outside
environment, physical and social.
But we humans also respond to ourselves. In Skinner’s terms, we act
as our own audience. We are still responding to a stimulus, but we provided that stimulus. This as Skinner has suggested, is the unique feature of human language.
We are not different because of our intelligence, whatever that may be, but
because we have language.
But that isn’t quite it either.
But that isn’t quite it either.
We are unique because we listen to ourselves and respond to
what we say, whether speaking out loud or performing that covert form of speech
we call thinking. So we teach ourselves to modify our response to a future
stimulus. We do it by thinking things through – sometimes with no further input than a
reworking of our own thoughts.
To my mind, this is what is spooky about being human. To a
certain degree we select our own behaviour. Just like an environment – we
select the behaviour that works - or seems to work.
3 comments:
It is a beautiful thing to "select our own behaviour"; this is what turns the behaviour into action, and gives it an ethical dimension through the exercise of responsibility.
Our problem, however, is that the part of us which does the selecting is itself the product of selection. Unless this factor (it can be called intelligence, morality, conscience, discernment, etc.) is itself highly developed, we may as well not bother.
Who selects the selector?
I propose that one model of a good life is when we only select our best behaviours, and (unlike, say, absolutists and religious zealots, etc.) we are constantly attempting to refine our selection mechanisms.
Natural selection is an important evolutionary process
On the Darwinian model?
Sam - it is beautiful and somewhat mysterious too. Not easy to probe without feeling you are saying too much about something so subtle.
JH - yes, very much his observational take on it.
Post a Comment