Suppose we take a look at current UK Political Polls - Westminster Voting Intention taken from here.
The competence of over half of the parties should be known to any voter who pays attention to these things - that is to say, Labour, Conservative Lib Dems and SNP. Yet on past performance we might plausibly suggest that all of these parties are known to be incompetent.
There are lots of caveats here, but add in Greens who base their appeal on an incompetent ideology and we might go on to suggest that about two thirds of voters seem to be politically incompetent.
There are lots of caveats here, but add in Greens who base their appeal on an incompetent ideology and we might go on to suggest that about two thirds of voters seem to be politically incompetent.
This is not a suggestion that voters should support Reform, more a case of noting that far too many voters give their vote to parties with a history of political incompetence.
2 comments:
Although in fairness to the voters the paucity of choice previously was to vote for (perhaps) the least incompetent party. A choice so limited that voting by tradition was as sensible as any other means.
This suited the established parties (who didn't need to prove competence) and raised high bars against new parties.
But once the media started to exploit the parties for newsworthy articles the 'steady as she goes' political stance has shown daily evidence of incompetence (whether true or not). The new parties are in with a chance...
The paucity of the competent to elect is major. Anyone halfway competent then needs to show corruptibility before preselection.
Post a Comment