Sometimes I browse the internet and I’m overwhelmed by the
volume of material which is too good to miss but I don’t have the time
because there is far too much of it. Yes much of it is dross, but the dross is easily avoided. The good material is radical too and that’s the point. Having it so easily available is like coming up
for air after a lifetime spent underwater swimming through the murk and
rubbish.
Much of it comes down to language, pointed, witty, accurate,
iconoclastic language. Yet the problem with language is that we can’t have our
own private version. Wittgenstein pointed this out although it is obvious
enough. So we can’t possess language, can’t think in our own personal language,
can’t use anything but the tools we have in common, the tools which evolved to
channel our thinking to make it easy, automatic and thus efficient.
As we know, this why all totalitarian societies control language.
Control language and you control thought. It might be expected that North
Korean would be a ferment of covert dissatisfaction but it probably isn’t
anywhere near as radical as one would suppose. Control permissible language
and to a significant degree you control that covert language we call thought.
Yet things are obviously changing. To my mind, since the
arrival of the internet the public domain has become far more varied,
interesting, probing and amateur. Not amateur as in inferior to professional,
but amateur as in unpaid, unscripted and uncontrolled by big business or big
government.
Amateurs with relevant experience, abilities, nous and the
ability to express themselves as if they too have come up for air and are
enjoying every minute of it. Loose cannon in best, most productive, most
interesting, most fascinating sense of the term.
We still see lots of professional radicalism, especially on the BBC,
but the establishment radical seems to be on the wane. Amateur internet radicals
are smarter, wittier and much more in tune with the causes of our many problems. They have stories to tell, know how to tell them
and the establishment wilts in the face of their blunt and pithy honesty.
Look at the way Prince Charles flounders around trying to
speak his mind on issues he does not understand. Too old, too hidebound, no
exposure to the best of the internet – that’s my impression of him. So he sinks
and sinks again, becoming a figure of fun, contempt, an icon of the old ways, a
lost soul.
2 comments:
If HRH Prince Charles prefers to appoint yes men to advise him and depends on them almost entirely for sourcing information they will tend to reinforce his prejudices and notions about this and that. I very much doubt if he has either the time or the know how to seek out, read fully and analyse the wealth of material that is out there at the moment. So despite all the staff he is no better off than your average man when it comes to giving opinions, in fact be is very average, if you know what I mean.
Demetrius - yes and the problem is likely to be much wider than HRH. Anyone without the time to do their own research is in the hands of those sources they trust. All very well, but how do they research the validity of their own trust?
Post a Comment