The ease of modern communication is often seen as a good thing, socially, politically and economically. But what if there is a dark side to it?
One attraction of reading early writers in any field is
often their unassuming nature. They write as they see, before the academic barnacles had a chance to encrust and obscure the original structure. In modern
terms that structure may be somewhat lacking of course, but that doesn’t always
matter.
One such is Gustave Le Bon. Politically incorrect and not the most profound writer, but some of what he wrote is worth a second thought. For example, he believed that a crowd wipes
out the intellectual faculties of its members. Not a new idea even then and
many others have expressed similar views, but take this quote as an example.
The substitution of
the unconscious action of crowds for the conscious activity of individuals is
one of the principal characteristics of the present age.
This very fact that
crowds possess in common ordinary qualities explains why they can never
accomplish acts demanding a high degree of intelligence. The decisions
affecting matters of general interest come to by an assembly of men of
distinction, but specialists in different walks of life, are not sensibly
superior to the decisions that would be adopted by a gathering of imbeciles.
Gustave Le Bon - The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (1895)
This is more than cynical rhetoric. Le Bon is saying that
crowds or assemblies have their own psychology which is not the sum of component individuals. It is something else, something sentimental, conservative, easily swayed by images and not intelligent in the sense that an individual is intelligent.
Okay, one could pile on the caveats and exceptions to this,
but in the modern world when crowds become assemblies and when assemblies can
be virtual assemblies on the web, then what if Le Bon was right? How much
intellectual resource is the internet liable to suck out of our collective
heads?
An implication of Le Bon’s point, whatever its limitations,
is that many kinds of association constitute an intellectual loss for its
members. By adopting a group belief, we don’t put our intellect on hold, we
lose it wherever the belief system holds sway. Our critical faculties disappear
like smoke on a windy day.
To know the art of
impressing the imagination of crowds is to know at the same time the art of
governing them.
Gustave Le Bon - The Crowd: A study of the popular mind
The internet as the ultimate virtual assembly may damage or even destroy our collective critical faculties. The web may become a conservative, sentimental
and unintelligent virtual crowd.
4 comments:
The internet as the ultimate virtual assembly may damage or even destroy our collective critical faculties.
Beautiful, AKH, beautiful.
James - thanks (:
There is an assumption here, that many people have critical faculties. This may be over optimistic. If so the crowd effect may be just an emotional spasm led by unthinking and ignorant people. So in today's world we have government by emotion and decision making by irrational spasms.
Demetrius - good point. Critical faculties have to be developed but are not essential for daily life. Possibly even a hindrance.
Post a Comment