Everyone
should be free to choose for himself the foundations of his creed.
Baruch Spinoza - Tractatus Theologico-Politicus
Nice try Baruch old fruit, but we should be so lucky.
Political correctness, cultural ambiguities, middle class anxieties and an abundance of stupidity seem to have evolved into what looks like a global creed. We see its
fingerprints all over the current obsession with fanatically detailed social control, so let us see where the notion takes us. First we have to give the
Creed more width and depth than we see in political correctness.
To begin with we need not assume that the Creed was designed by some evil
cabal of international fixers. Once it had enough momentum, then moral stupidity and
political cupidity were enough to make it fly. All it required was an endless
supply of nudges from inadequate politicians and our willingness to be
nudged. Willingness in the sense of crowding together with regular prods to
keep us mooing along in the right direction.
So the Creed is merely an outcome of our prosperous
silliness, cultural weaknesses and feeble political ambivalence. It revels in those weirdly sentimental pretensions to ethical integrity we see in
the so-called liberal media. The BBC and the Guardian for example.
Creed angst – you are destroying the planet.
Creed angst - the rich and powerful will do bad things.
Creed angst – something must be done.
Creed sloth – something must be done.
Creed economics – tax the rich.
Creed equality – tax the rich.
Creed philosophy – what’s your label?
Creed politics – what’s your label?
Creed religion – what’s your label?
Creed diversity – the One Creed is the Only Creed.
And so on. Essentially the Creed appears to be an evolved
form of global socialism with a pervasive sentimental fuzziness woven into
every thread of its fabric. It has no formal structure because it doesn’t need
one. Now it has taken root it simply spews out more and more laws,
regulations, treaties and those sanctimonious nudges providing constant reassurance
that Something Will Always Be Done.
Equally important is the rise of an ugly and vindictive
hostility directed at non-Creed folk. The threat is real - the Creed is ferociously
anti-intellectual. The endlessly subtle malice of ostracism and low-key malice are
directed at anyone who is openly non-Creed. This is a powerful feature –
everyone is free to be as sanctimoniously malicious towards infidels as they
wish.
The Creed is promoted by the EU, the UN, a vast array of
charities and tax-funded pressure groups as well as traditional political
parties of the left or right although it tends leans heavily to the left. As
with Freudian psychoanalysis, Creed memes and narratives are aimed at acolytes
only. The opinions of outside critics are irrelevant, usually attributed to
their aberrant non-Creed psychology.
As the Creed is globally promoted and backed by colossal
political and financial clout, its memes, narratives and prohibitions will be a
dominant feature of our lives for decades at least. Forever in practical terms.
We can’t ignore it and Creed imbecilities still have to be
trashed. But it is rather like standing at the door arguing with Jehovah’s
Witnesses. Sooner or later it is time to close the door and put the kettle on.
There are better things to do, fragments of integrity to gather in and nurture
against a long Creed winter.
3 comments:
Cogito ergo sum, but I am beginning to think that Hobbes has a point. On the other hand, Jeremy Taylor....
The threat is real - the Creed is ferociously anti-intellectual.
What isn't? The intellectuals have always been on the back foot.
Demetrius - a problem with any social or political overview is the problem of prediction - where does it all lead? History is a good guide but we seem to have forgotten that.
James - outnumbered I suppose (:
Post a Comment