source |
Below is a quote from Quine, a single sentence with which you may agree, disagree or reserve judgement. To my mind the sentence is problematic for two reasons. The first is that if accepted as true, then it has a fundamental influence on one’s personal philosophy.
There are so-called
logical connections, and there are so-called causal ones; but any such
interconnections of sentences must finally be due to the conditioning of
sentences as responses to sentences as stimuli.
Willard Van Orman Quine - Word and Object
The second problem is that Quine’s sentence is true.
Obviously that doesn’t mean everyone has to accept it as
true. It is rooted in commonly observed human behaviour, but no doubt many people have
other standpoints on which they prefer to secure their personal philosophy.
Yet from early childhood we develop mental causal networks
where one sentence causes another to pop out of our repertoire of responses. We are trained to give normative responses in order to use language
effectively, so naturally enough that is what we do for the rest of our lives.
Citizens of the monolithic and tightly controlled political culture
envisaged by George Orwell in his novel 1984 find it difficult or impossible to
stray beyond political norms because their repertoire of responses has been so
ruthlessly limited by the regime.
Winston Smith only achieves a glimpse of what freedom might
mean via his work on altering newspaper reports, his constant exposure to
physical evidence that all available information is being made to conform to
current political narratives.
Smith’s awareness that things have been different gives him a limited ability to see that there are alternatives to official narratives. Unfortunately for him, he only
sees what may be a deliberately constructed alternative – Goldstein’s ideology
of dissent.
Without Smith's exposure to physical evidence, we may assume he would never have strayed that far. Even without the
full implementation of Newspeak, he would have had insufficient exposure to any standpoint beyond established political norms. He and his fellow citizens cannot think out of the box if the box is all there is.
So Orwell was right. In a monolithic totalitarian culture, Newspeak is not only possible, but may even be inevitable.
So Orwell was right. In a monolithic totalitarian culture, Newspeak is not only possible, but may even be inevitable.
4 comments:
What sentence provoked Quine's as an automatic response?
Sackers - it's the range of possible responses that is automatic. As for Quine it could have been anything. Possibly a comment about logic initially.
You touch upon something current here. With the assumption of pervasive surveillance and probable means of heading off any protest I suspect people may more rarely express dissent overtly, but save their ire for the ballot box and dare I say the largely pointless mumblings on the blogs. Emmanuel is probably a long term civil servant and as we speak he is looking forward to sherry and then lunch followed by a precis of the blogs and the marking of certain cards.
Roger - I've been thinking along those lines too. It may be the function of blogs - an outlet for ire.
Post a Comment