Why is it that when certain waffle-mongers feel a pressing need to say something portentous, they have to put the word arguably before their piece? What is it supposed to add?
Surely the whole world knows this as a waffle-monger's thumb print, so why give the game away at such an early stage?
6 comments:
Put it into a scale, from "as any fule kno..." down to "only an idiot would think..."
Sackers - lower than either of your two examples which at least set some kind of tone.
Arguably they do so as a sop to people who would disagree :-)
Woodsy - aarrggghhuably!
Arguably, you're right about this, one would suspect, AKH.
James - aarrggghhuably again!
Post a Comment