I'm waiting quietly to see if the judge refers the behaviour of the prosecution to a standards committee or whatever. I also wonder what the judge would have done if the jury had returned a guilty verdict. As it is Rittenhouse has been found not guilty even though the prosecution played to win.
Due to spam comments and now the UK Online Safety Act, comment moderation is on. Anonymous or impolite comments or comments likely to be flagged by the system are liable to be treated as spam.
Reusable headline:
ReplyDeletePresident Angry At Result, Calls For Demonstrations
(Imagined) Sub heading under the Independent headline:
ReplyDelete"And it wouldn't have happened if the UK was still part of the EU"
Shouldn't there be one reading "Rittenhouse prosecution wriggles: desperate to shift blame and avoid being sued"
ReplyDelete@The Jannie
ReplyDeleteI'm waiting quietly to see if the judge refers the behaviour of the prosecution to a standards committee or whatever. I also wonder what the judge would have done if the jury had returned a guilty verdict. As it is Rittenhouse has been found not guilty even though the prosecution played to win.
Sackers - as effectively he did. Disgusting really, but accepted behaviour now.
ReplyDeleteDJ - ha ha very good. Although it is the Independent...
Jannie and DJ - yes these are the interesting possibilities. Popcorn time.