The most remarkable change seems to have been the end of the photographer's revolving chair. That first sequence was distinctly alarming. Presumably there was an assistant below eye-level who propelled it.
WY - I assume so although it may have happened anyway. Those later fashions were much more suited to cost cutting and mass market appeal, plus American influences and the cinema.
Demetrius - probably an endangered species rather than rabbit. They were more robust about these things.
Due to spam comments and now the UK Online Safety Act, comment moderation is on. Anonymous or impolite comments or comments likely to be flagged by the system are liable to be treated as spam.
The most remarkable change seems to have been the end of the photographer's revolving chair. That first sequence was distinctly alarming. Presumably there was an assistant below eye-level who propelled it.
ReplyDeleteSam - perhaps the assistant was the cameraman's mum who then referred to herself as Lady Turner.
ReplyDeleteThe remarkable change was presumably the First World War.
ReplyDeletePhwoar to the Edwardian gels. Alas, my grannies were earlier in their younger days. As to the 20's and that fetching fur coat, was it best rabbit?
ReplyDeleteSome pleasant viewing in bed later.
ReplyDeleteWY - I assume so although it may have happened anyway. Those later fashions were much more suited to cost cutting and mass market appeal, plus American influences and the cinema.
ReplyDeleteDemetrius - probably an endangered species rather than rabbit. They were more robust about these things.
James - whatever do you mean?